protein family and domain annotations Search Results


90
ProSci Incorporated recombinant phlda2
Recombinant Phlda2, supplied by ProSci Incorporated, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc06978363__41467_2019_14033_MOESM2_ESM-44-45-47?v=ProSci+Incorporated
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant phlda2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boster Bio rabbit anti nlrc4
Rabbit Anti Nlrc4, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc07052202-506-81-91?v=Boster+Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti nlrc4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Boster Bio nlrc4
Nlrc4, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc12964219-280-59-61?v=Boster+Bio
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nlrc4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Rockland Immunochemicals m igg
M Igg, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc11536160-173-8-10?v=Rockland+Immunochemicals
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m igg - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boster Bio antibody against grem2
Primer sequences used for RT-qPCR
Antibody Against Grem2, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc08161583-67-13-30?v=Boster+Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody against grem2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Boster Bio card asc
Primer sequences used for RT-qPCR
Card Asc, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc09924664-225-37-43?v=Boster+Bio
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
card asc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProSci Incorporated card
Primer sequences used for RT-qPCR
Card, supplied by ProSci Incorporated, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc02888403-88-13-15?v=ProSci+Incorporated
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
card - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProSci Incorporated rabbit anti human ipaf nlrc4 antibody
Figure 1. <t>NLRC4</t> protects against B16F10 tumor growth in vivo. (A–F) WT and Nlrp6–/– (A), Nlrp12–/– (B), Nlrp3–/– (C), and Nlrc4–/– (D–F) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–C and E) Tumor mass was determined at 16 to 20 days after inoculation. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– tumor areas (length × width) were measured every 2 to 3 days. (F) Representative images of excised WT and Nlrc4–/– B16F10 tumors. (A–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (A–C and E) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (D) Error bars represent SEM. **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test.
Rabbit Anti Human Ipaf Nlrc4 Antibody, supplied by ProSci Incorporated, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/10__1172_slash_jci86953-227-12-19?v=ProSci+Incorporated
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti human ipaf nlrc4 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Boster Bio monoclonal mouse anti human cd4 percp
Figure 1. <t>NLRC4</t> protects against B16F10 tumor growth in vivo. (A–F) WT and Nlrp6–/– (A), Nlrp12–/– (B), Nlrp3–/– (C), and Nlrc4–/– (D–F) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–C and E) Tumor mass was determined at 16 to 20 days after inoculation. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– tumor areas (length × width) were measured every 2 to 3 days. (F) Representative images of excised WT and Nlrc4–/– B16F10 tumors. (A–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (A–C and E) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (D) Error bars represent SEM. **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test.
Monoclonal Mouse Anti Human Cd4 Percp, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc10862566-38-4-36?v=Boster+Bio
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal mouse anti human cd4 percp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InterPro Inc protein families and domains
Figure 1. <t>NLRC4</t> protects against B16F10 tumor growth in vivo. (A–F) WT and Nlrp6–/– (A), Nlrp12–/– (B), Nlrp3–/– (C), and Nlrc4–/– (D–F) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–C and E) Tumor mass was determined at 16 to 20 days after inoculation. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– tumor areas (length × width) were measured every 2 to 3 days. (F) Representative images of excised WT and Nlrc4–/– B16F10 tumors. (A–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (A–C and E) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (D) Error bars represent SEM. **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test.
Protein Families And Domains, supplied by InterPro Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc07145693-10-17-18?v=InterPro+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protein families and domains - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InterPro Inc integrated resource of protein families, domains and functional sites database of uniprot consortium (interpro)
Figure 1. <t>NLRC4</t> protects against B16F10 tumor growth in vivo. (A–F) WT and Nlrp6–/– (A), Nlrp12–/– (B), Nlrp3–/– (C), and Nlrc4–/– (D–F) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–C and E) Tumor mass was determined at 16 to 20 days after inoculation. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– tumor areas (length × width) were measured every 2 to 3 days. (F) Representative images of excised WT and Nlrc4–/– B16F10 tumors. (A–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (A–C and E) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (D) Error bars represent SEM. **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test.
Integrated Resource Of Protein Families, Domains And Functional Sites Database Of Uniprot Consortium (Interpro), supplied by InterPro Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc05374389-121-16-26?v=InterPro+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
integrated resource of protein families, domains and functional sites database of uniprot consortium (interpro) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
InterPro Inc protein domain, family and motif information extracted from
Figure 1. <t>NLRC4</t> protects against B16F10 tumor growth in vivo. (A–F) WT and Nlrp6–/– (A), Nlrp12–/– (B), Nlrp3–/– (C), and Nlrc4–/– (D–F) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–C and E) Tumor mass was determined at 16 to 20 days after inoculation. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– tumor areas (length × width) were measured every 2 to 3 days. (F) Representative images of excised WT and Nlrc4–/– B16F10 tumors. (A–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (A–C and E) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (D) Error bars represent SEM. **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test.
Protein Domain, Family And Motif Information Extracted From, supplied by InterPro Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/protein+family+and+domain+annotations/pmc08294856-237-6-10?v=InterPro+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protein domain, family and motif information extracted from - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Primer sequences used for RT-qPCR

Journal: Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters

Article Title: LncRNA DNM3OS regulates GREM2 via miR-127-5p to suppress early chondrogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells under hypoxic conditions

doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00269-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Primer sequences used for RT-qPCR

Article Snippet: After finishing blocking in 0.1% BSA, the rMSCs were incubated with the primary antibody against GREM2 overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100 dilution; Boster Biological Technology) for 1 h at room temperature.

Techniques:

GREM2 was a target of miR-127-5p. A Nucleotide sequences of the predicted target site for miR-127-5p in the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR. B Luciferase reporter assays were performed to identify direct interaction between miR-127-5p and the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR. Wild type and mutant miR-127-5p target binding sequences in the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR were cloned into a reporter luciferase vector and co-transfected with the synthetized miR-127-5p (or NC) into rMSCs. *** p < 0.001, compared with NC; C GREM2 protein expression was measured in rMSCs from the control, induction, hypoxia, and hypoxia/induction groups. D GREM2 protein expression was measured in rMSCs from the control, induction, and si-SHP/hypoxia groups. E GREM2 protein expression was measured in rMSCs from the control, induction, and miR-127-5p inhibitor/induction groups. F GREM2 protein expression in rMSCs was measured by immunofluorescence. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, compared with control; # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.001, compared with hypoxia or induction group

Journal: Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters

Article Title: LncRNA DNM3OS regulates GREM2 via miR-127-5p to suppress early chondrogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells under hypoxic conditions

doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00269-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: GREM2 was a target of miR-127-5p. A Nucleotide sequences of the predicted target site for miR-127-5p in the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR. B Luciferase reporter assays were performed to identify direct interaction between miR-127-5p and the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR. Wild type and mutant miR-127-5p target binding sequences in the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR were cloned into a reporter luciferase vector and co-transfected with the synthetized miR-127-5p (or NC) into rMSCs. *** p < 0.001, compared with NC; C GREM2 protein expression was measured in rMSCs from the control, induction, hypoxia, and hypoxia/induction groups. D GREM2 protein expression was measured in rMSCs from the control, induction, and si-SHP/hypoxia groups. E GREM2 protein expression was measured in rMSCs from the control, induction, and miR-127-5p inhibitor/induction groups. F GREM2 protein expression in rMSCs was measured by immunofluorescence. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, compared with control; # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.001, compared with hypoxia or induction group

Article Snippet: After finishing blocking in 0.1% BSA, the rMSCs were incubated with the primary antibody against GREM2 overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100 dilution; Boster Biological Technology) for 1 h at room temperature.

Techniques: Luciferase, Mutagenesis, Binding Assay, Clone Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Transfection, Expressing, Control, Immunofluorescence

Overexpression of miR-127-5p promoted chondrogenic differentiation of rMSCs by regulating GREM2-mediated SMAD-dependent BMP signaling. The rMSCs were transfected with miR-127-5p mimics, followed by hypoxia intervention (1% O 2 ) and induction of chondrogenic differentiation for 14 days. A MiR-127-5p and GREM2 expression levels were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of data obtained from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared with control; ### p < 0.001, compared with induction group; p < 0.001, compared with hypoxia/induction; B Images from Alcian blue staining assays of rMSCs. C Levels of COL1A1, COL2A1, SOX9, and ACAN protein expression were detected in rMSCs. D Levels of GREM2, BMP2, p-SMAD1, and p-SMAD2 protein expression in rMSCs were detected by western blotting. E GREM2 protein expression in rMSCs was detected by immunofluorescence

Journal: Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters

Article Title: LncRNA DNM3OS regulates GREM2 via miR-127-5p to suppress early chondrogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells under hypoxic conditions

doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00269-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Overexpression of miR-127-5p promoted chondrogenic differentiation of rMSCs by regulating GREM2-mediated SMAD-dependent BMP signaling. The rMSCs were transfected with miR-127-5p mimics, followed by hypoxia intervention (1% O 2 ) and induction of chondrogenic differentiation for 14 days. A MiR-127-5p and GREM2 expression levels were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of data obtained from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001, compared with control; ### p < 0.001, compared with induction group; p < 0.001, compared with hypoxia/induction; B Images from Alcian blue staining assays of rMSCs. C Levels of COL1A1, COL2A1, SOX9, and ACAN protein expression were detected in rMSCs. D Levels of GREM2, BMP2, p-SMAD1, and p-SMAD2 protein expression in rMSCs were detected by western blotting. E GREM2 protein expression in rMSCs was detected by immunofluorescence

Article Snippet: After finishing blocking in 0.1% BSA, the rMSCs were incubated with the primary antibody against GREM2 overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100 dilution; Boster Biological Technology) for 1 h at room temperature.

Techniques: Over Expression, Transfection, Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Standard Deviation, Control, Staining, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence

DNM3OS inhibited chondrogenic differentiation of rMSCs via miR-127-5p regulation of GREM2. The rMSCs were transfected with a DNM3OS overexpression plasmid, followed by induction of chondrogenic differentiation for 14 days. Accordingly, the rMSCs were classified into control, induction, hypoxia, hypoxia/induction, and DNM3OS/induction groups. A The putative binding site for miR-127-5p in the DNM3OS 3′-UTR is shown. B DNM3OS expression was determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. C A luciferase reporter assay was performed to identify direct action between DNM3OS and the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR. D Levels of DNM3OS, miR-127-5p, and GREM2 expression were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of data obtained from three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared with control; # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.001, compared with induction group; E Images from Alcian blue staining assays of rMSCs. (F) Levels of COL1A1, COL2A1, SOX9, and ACAN protein expression were detected in rMSCs. G Levels of GREM2, BMP2, p-SMAD1, and p-SMAD2 in rMSCs were detected by western blotting. H GREM2 protein expression in rMSCs was measured by immunofluorescence

Journal: Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters

Article Title: LncRNA DNM3OS regulates GREM2 via miR-127-5p to suppress early chondrogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells under hypoxic conditions

doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00269-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: DNM3OS inhibited chondrogenic differentiation of rMSCs via miR-127-5p regulation of GREM2. The rMSCs were transfected with a DNM3OS overexpression plasmid, followed by induction of chondrogenic differentiation for 14 days. Accordingly, the rMSCs were classified into control, induction, hypoxia, hypoxia/induction, and DNM3OS/induction groups. A The putative binding site for miR-127-5p in the DNM3OS 3′-UTR is shown. B DNM3OS expression was determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. C A luciferase reporter assay was performed to identify direct action between DNM3OS and the GREM2 3ʹ-UTR. D Levels of DNM3OS, miR-127-5p, and GREM2 expression were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of data obtained from three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, compared with control; # p < 0.05, ### p < 0.001, compared with induction group; E Images from Alcian blue staining assays of rMSCs. (F) Levels of COL1A1, COL2A1, SOX9, and ACAN protein expression were detected in rMSCs. G Levels of GREM2, BMP2, p-SMAD1, and p-SMAD2 in rMSCs were detected by western blotting. H GREM2 protein expression in rMSCs was measured by immunofluorescence

Article Snippet: After finishing blocking in 0.1% BSA, the rMSCs were incubated with the primary antibody against GREM2 overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100 dilution; Boster Biological Technology) for 1 h at room temperature.

Techniques: Transfection, Over Expression, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Binding Assay, Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Standard Deviation, Staining, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence

DNM3OS knockdown weakened the inhibitory effect of hypoxia on chondrogenic induction. The rMSCs were transfected with si-DNM3OS, followed by induction of chondrogenic differentiation under hypoxic conditions (1% O 2 ) for 14 days. A Levels of miR-127-5p, DNM3OS, and GREM2 expression were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. *** p < 0.001, compared with si-NC + hypoxia/induction group. B Levels of GREM2, BMP2, p-SMAD1, and p-SMAD2 in rMSCs were detected by western blotting. C Images from Alcian blue staining assays of rMSCs. (D) Levels of COL1A1, COL2A1, SOX9, and ACAN protein expression were detected in rMSCs. si-NC: negative control

Journal: Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters

Article Title: LncRNA DNM3OS regulates GREM2 via miR-127-5p to suppress early chondrogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells under hypoxic conditions

doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00269-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: DNM3OS knockdown weakened the inhibitory effect of hypoxia on chondrogenic induction. The rMSCs were transfected with si-DNM3OS, followed by induction of chondrogenic differentiation under hypoxic conditions (1% O 2 ) for 14 days. A Levels of miR-127-5p, DNM3OS, and GREM2 expression were determined by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. *** p < 0.001, compared with si-NC + hypoxia/induction group. B Levels of GREM2, BMP2, p-SMAD1, and p-SMAD2 in rMSCs were detected by western blotting. C Images from Alcian blue staining assays of rMSCs. (D) Levels of COL1A1, COL2A1, SOX9, and ACAN protein expression were detected in rMSCs. si-NC: negative control

Article Snippet: After finishing blocking in 0.1% BSA, the rMSCs were incubated with the primary antibody against GREM2 overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100 dilution; Boster Biological Technology) for 1 h at room temperature.

Techniques: Knockdown, Transfection, Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Staining, Negative Control

Figure 1. NLRC4 protects against B16F10 tumor growth in vivo. (A–F) WT and Nlrp6–/– (A), Nlrp12–/– (B), Nlrp3–/– (C), and Nlrc4–/– (D–F) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–C and E) Tumor mass was determined at 16 to 20 days after inoculation. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– tumor areas (length × width) were measured every 2 to 3 days. (F) Representative images of excised WT and Nlrc4–/– B16F10 tumors. (A–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (A–C and E) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (D) Error bars represent SEM. **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. NLRC4 protects against B16F10 tumor growth in vivo. (A–F) WT and Nlrp6–/– (A), Nlrp12–/– (B), Nlrp3–/– (C), and Nlrc4–/– (D–F) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–C and E) Tumor mass was determined at 16 to 20 days after inoculation. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– tumor areas (length × width) were measured every 2 to 3 days. (F) Representative images of excised WT and Nlrc4–/– B16F10 tumors. (A–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (A–C and E) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (D) Error bars represent SEM. **P ≤ 0.01, ****P ≤ 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA with Šidák’s multiple comparisons test.

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: In Vivo, Injection

Figure 2. Human primary melanoma is enriched with NLRC4+ macrophages. (A) Deidentified skin biopsies of normal skin (n = 3 patients), benign mela- nocytic nevi (n = 3 patients), primary invasive melanomas (n = 3 patients), and metastatic melanomas (n = 3 patients) were stained for CD163 (brown) and NLRC4 (brown). Images were taken with a ×40 objective. (B) The densities of five 20× high-power fields (each 3.14 mm2) were determined per patient sample. **P ≤ 0.01; ****P ≤ 0.0001, Mann–Whitney U test.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Human primary melanoma is enriched with NLRC4+ macrophages. (A) Deidentified skin biopsies of normal skin (n = 3 patients), benign mela- nocytic nevi (n = 3 patients), primary invasive melanomas (n = 3 patients), and metastatic melanomas (n = 3 patients) were stained for CD163 (brown) and NLRC4 (brown). Images were taken with a ×40 objective. (B) The densities of five 20× high-power fields (each 3.14 mm2) were determined per patient sample. **P ≤ 0.01; ****P ≤ 0.0001, Mann–Whitney U test.

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: Staining, MANN-WHITNEY

Figure 3. NLRC4-mediated protection against tumor growth is independent of inflammasome activation. (A–D) WT, Asc–/– (A and B), and Casp1–/– (C and D) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A and C) Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days. (B and D) Tumor mass was determined at 17 to 20 days after inoculation. (A–D) Data are representative of 3 experiments with n ≥ 5 mice per group. (A and C) Error bars represent SEM. (B and D) Unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (E) B16F10 tumors from WT and Nlrc4–/– mice on day 14 after inoculation were homogenized and immunoblotted with antibodies against caspase-1 and GAPDH. Each lane represents a tumor from an individual mouse. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. NLRC4-mediated protection against tumor growth is independent of inflammasome activation. (A–D) WT, Asc–/– (A and B), and Casp1–/– (C and D) mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A and C) Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days. (B and D) Tumor mass was determined at 17 to 20 days after inoculation. (A–D) Data are representative of 3 experiments with n ≥ 5 mice per group. (A and C) Error bars represent SEM. (B and D) Unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (E) B16F10 tumors from WT and Nlrc4–/– mice on day 14 after inoculation were homogenized and immunoblotted with antibodies against caspase-1 and GAPDH. Each lane represents a tumor from an individual mouse. Data are representative of 2 independent experiments.

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Injection

Figure 4. Expression of Nlrc4 in hematopoietic cells is important for controlling tumor growth. (A) Expression of Nlrc4 in BMDMs, fibroblasts, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B16F10, and LLC cells was determined by qPCR and represented as expression relative to Nlrc4 expression in BMDMs. Data are represen- tative of 2 independent experiments. (B and C) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were lethally irradiated and reconstituted with either WT or Nlrc4–/– BM (donor BM → recipient mouse). Mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (B) Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days. (C) Tumor mass was determined at day 19 after inoculation. (B and C) Data are representative of 2 experiments with n ≥ 9 mice per experiment. (B) Error bars represent SEM. ##P ≤ 0.01 (for Nlrc4–/–

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Expression of Nlrc4 in hematopoietic cells is important for controlling tumor growth. (A) Expression of Nlrc4 in BMDMs, fibroblasts, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B16F10, and LLC cells was determined by qPCR and represented as expression relative to Nlrc4 expression in BMDMs. Data are represen- tative of 2 independent experiments. (B and C) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were lethally irradiated and reconstituted with either WT or Nlrc4–/– BM (donor BM → recipient mouse). Mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (B) Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days. (C) Tumor mass was determined at day 19 after inoculation. (B and C) Data are representative of 2 experiments with n ≥ 9 mice per experiment. (B) Error bars represent SEM. ##P ≤ 0.01 (for Nlrc4–/–

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: Expressing, Irradiation, Injection

Figure 5. Absence of NLRC4 in macrophages alters the tumor cytokine and chemokine milieu. (A–F) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. On day 12 after inoculation, total RNA was isolated from homogenized tumors and used to determine cytokine and chemokine expression via quantitative qPCR utilizing a PCR array. Selected genes from the array are displayed; data are pooled from 3 separate experiments (n = 3 mice per group). (G and H) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells; 14 days after inoculation, tumors were harvested, pooled, and FACS sorted based on CD45.2 and F4/80 staining. RNA was isolated from CD45.2- and CD45.2+F4/80+ cells and used to determine Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Cxcl13, and Cxcl16 expression by qPCR; data are representative of 2 independent experiments with n ≥ 5 pooled tumors per group. (I) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 9 hours with B16F10 whole tumor homogenate. Cxcl9, Cxcl10, and Cxcl13 expression was determined by qPCR. Data are pooled from 3 independent experi- ments, and fold change in gene expression is relative to unstimulated samples. (J and K) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged with 50 ng/ml LPS, 50 μg/ml LTA, 100 ng/ml FSL-1, and 1 μg/ml Pam3CSK4. Twenty hours later, supernatants were collected and levels of IL-6 (J) and IL-12p40 (K) determined by ELISA; data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (A–F and I) Error bars represent SEM. (J and K) Error bars represent SD. (I–K) *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, and ***P ≤ 0.001, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Absence of NLRC4 in macrophages alters the tumor cytokine and chemokine milieu. (A–F) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. On day 12 after inoculation, total RNA was isolated from homogenized tumors and used to determine cytokine and chemokine expression via quantitative qPCR utilizing a PCR array. Selected genes from the array are displayed; data are pooled from 3 separate experiments (n = 3 mice per group). (G and H) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells; 14 days after inoculation, tumors were harvested, pooled, and FACS sorted based on CD45.2 and F4/80 staining. RNA was isolated from CD45.2- and CD45.2+F4/80+ cells and used to determine Cxcl9, Cxcl10, Cxcl13, and Cxcl16 expression by qPCR; data are representative of 2 independent experiments with n ≥ 5 pooled tumors per group. (I) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 9 hours with B16F10 whole tumor homogenate. Cxcl9, Cxcl10, and Cxcl13 expression was determined by qPCR. Data are pooled from 3 independent experi- ments, and fold change in gene expression is relative to unstimulated samples. (J and K) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged with 50 ng/ml LPS, 50 μg/ml LTA, 100 ng/ml FSL-1, and 1 μg/ml Pam3CSK4. Twenty hours later, supernatants were collected and levels of IL-6 (J) and IL-12p40 (K) determined by ELISA; data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (A–F and I) Error bars represent SEM. (J and K) Error bars represent SD. (I–K) *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, and ***P ≤ 0.001, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: Injection, Isolation, Expressing, Staining, Gene Expression, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Figure 6. NLRC4 regulates STAT3 and p38 MAPK signaling in the tumor microenvironment. (A and B) B16F10 tumors from WT and Nlrc4–/– mice at day 14 after inoculation were homogenized and immunoblotted for phospho-STAT3 and STAT3 (A), phospho-p38 MAPK and p38 MAPK (B), and GAPDH (A and B). Each lane represents a tumor from an individual mouse. (A and B) Densitometry of the ratio of phosphorylated to total protein is shown. (C) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours with 50 ng/ml LPS. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against phospho-STAT3, STAT3, and GAPDH. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes with 50 ng/ml LPS. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, and GAPDH. (E) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes with 10 ng/ ml recombinant IL-6. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against phospho-STAT3, STAT3, and GAPDH. (C–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (A and B) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. NLRC4 regulates STAT3 and p38 MAPK signaling in the tumor microenvironment. (A and B) B16F10 tumors from WT and Nlrc4–/– mice at day 14 after inoculation were homogenized and immunoblotted for phospho-STAT3 and STAT3 (A), phospho-p38 MAPK and p38 MAPK (B), and GAPDH (A and B). Each lane represents a tumor from an individual mouse. (A and B) Densitometry of the ratio of phosphorylated to total protein is shown. (C) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours with 50 ng/ml LPS. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against phospho-STAT3, STAT3, and GAPDH. (D) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes with 50 ng/ml LPS. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, and GAPDH. (E) WT and Nlrc4–/– BMDMs were challenged for 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes with 10 ng/ ml recombinant IL-6. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against phospho-STAT3, STAT3, and GAPDH. (C–E) Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. (A and B) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: Recombinant

Figure 7. NLRC4 is required for IFN-γ+ tumor-infiltrating effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (A–I) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–D and F–I) On day 14 after inoculation, tumors were made into single-cell suspensions for flow cytometry; the CD45.2+ population was gated on and the frequency of Thy1.2+CD4+ T cells (A), Thy1.2+CD8+ T cells (B), F4/80+ macrophages (F), CD11c+MHCII+ dendritic cells (G), CD11b+GR1+ monocytes (H), and Foxp3+CD4+ regulatory T cells (I) determined. (C and D) Single-cell suspensions of tumor cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin, followed by intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-γ. Frequency of CD4+IFN-γ+ T cells (C) and CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells (D) was determined by flow cytometry. Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments with n ≥ 3 mice per experiment. (E) IFN-γ gene expression in WT and Nlrc4–/– tumors on day 12 after inoculation was determined by qPCR; data are pooled from 3 independent experiments with n = 11 WT and n = 12 Nlrc4–/– mice. Error bars represent SEM. (A–I) *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7. NLRC4 is required for IFN-γ+ tumor-infiltrating effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (A–I) WT and Nlrc4–/– mice were injected s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells. (A–D and F–I) On day 14 after inoculation, tumors were made into single-cell suspensions for flow cytometry; the CD45.2+ population was gated on and the frequency of Thy1.2+CD4+ T cells (A), Thy1.2+CD8+ T cells (B), F4/80+ macrophages (F), CD11c+MHCII+ dendritic cells (G), CD11b+GR1+ monocytes (H), and Foxp3+CD4+ regulatory T cells (I) determined. (C and D) Single-cell suspensions of tumor cells were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin, followed by intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-γ. Frequency of CD4+IFN-γ+ T cells (C) and CD8+IFN-γ+ T cells (D) was determined by flow cytometry. Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments with n ≥ 3 mice per experiment. (E) IFN-γ gene expression in WT and Nlrc4–/– tumors on day 12 after inoculation was determined by qPCR; data are pooled from 3 independent experiments with n = 11 WT and n = 12 Nlrc4–/– mice. Error bars represent SEM. (A–I) *P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test.

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: Injection, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Gene Expression

Figure 8. Expression of NLRC4, and not caspase-1, in macrophages regulates B16F10 tumor growth. (A and B) Nlrc4–/– mice were challenged s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells alone, a mixture of 1 × 105 B16F10 cells and 5 × 104 WT BMDMs, or 1 × 105 B16F10 cells and 5 × 104 Nlrc4–/– BMDMs. Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days (A). Tumor mass was determined at 15 days after inoculation (B). Data are representative of 2 experiments with n = 4 mice per group (A) or pooled from 3 independent experiments (n = 12–15 mice per group; B). (C and D) Nlrc4–/– mice were challenged s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells alone or a mixture of 1 × 105 B16F10 cells and 5 × 104 Casp1–/– BMDMs. Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days (C) and tumor mass was determined at 18 days after inoculation (D). Data are representative of 2 experiments each with n = 6 mice per group (C) or pooled from 2 independent experiments (n = 12–13 mice per group; D). (A) Error bars represent SEM. *P ≤ 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01 (for B16F10 plus WT BMDMs compared with B16F10 plus Nlrc4–/– BMDMs); #P ≤ 0.05 (for B16F10 compared with B16F10 plus WT BMDMs), 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post-test for multiple comparisons. (B and D) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (C) Error bars represent SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test.

Journal: Journal of Clinical Investigation

Article Title: NLRC4 suppresses melanoma tumor progression independently of inflammasome activation

doi: 10.1172/jci86953

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 8. Expression of NLRC4, and not caspase-1, in macrophages regulates B16F10 tumor growth. (A and B) Nlrc4–/– mice were challenged s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells alone, a mixture of 1 × 105 B16F10 cells and 5 × 104 WT BMDMs, or 1 × 105 B16F10 cells and 5 × 104 Nlrc4–/– BMDMs. Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days (A). Tumor mass was determined at 15 days after inoculation (B). Data are representative of 2 experiments with n = 4 mice per group (A) or pooled from 3 independent experiments (n = 12–15 mice per group; B). (C and D) Nlrc4–/– mice were challenged s.c. with 1 × 105 B16F10 cells alone or a mixture of 1 × 105 B16F10 cells and 5 × 104 Casp1–/– BMDMs. Tumor area was measured every 2 to 3 days (C) and tumor mass was determined at 18 days after inoculation (D). Data are representative of 2 experiments each with n = 6 mice per group (C) or pooled from 2 independent experiments (n = 12–13 mice per group; D). (A) Error bars represent SEM. *P ≤ 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01 (for B16F10 plus WT BMDMs compared with B16F10 plus Nlrc4–/– BMDMs); #P ≤ 0.05 (for B16F10 compared with B16F10 plus WT BMDMs), 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post-test for multiple comparisons. (B and D) *P ≤ 0.05, unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test. (C) Error bars represent SEM. *P ≤ 0.05, 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test.

Article Snippet: Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human CD163 (catalog MCA1853T, ABD Serotech) and rabbit anti-human IPAF (NLRC4) antibody (catalog 3107, ProSci).

Techniques: Expressing